| |
PLENARY STATEMENT OF PARTICIPANTS AT THE AFRICAN WATER LAWS WORKSHOP
Download as a printable pdf file
pdf 1045 kB
Preamble
Over sixty lawyers, water resource policy makers and managers, NGO representatives,
and academics from twelve African states and other countries (listed
in the annex) participated in the international workshop 'African Water
Laws: Plural Legislative Frameworks for Rural Water Management in Africa'
held in Johannesburg, South Africa from 26 to 28 January 2005 . The
workshop discussed research findings on local community-based arrangements
for developing and managing water for small-scale domestic and productive
uses in rural Africa and the impacts of recent statutory water reform.
The workshop also compared African experiences with those in Asia and
Latin America. As presented in this statement, delegates formulated
recommendations for African governments, international financing institutions
and donors to consider in order to better recognize existing local community-based
water arrangements in policy, implementation, research and capacity
building for poverty alleviation and gender equity.
The 33 research papers upon which the workshop was based are available
at
www.nri.org/waterlaw/workshop
The effectiveness of local community-based water arrangements
For centuries, the majority of Africans have harnessed rainfall, runoff,
surface water and groundwater resources through self-constructed and
operated water harvesting devices including wells, river abstractions,
village dams, ponds, and pumps in order to meet their needs for drinking,
other domestic purposes, livestock watering, irrigation, fisheries,
brick making, small businesses and ceremonial uses. These water uses
were and are governed by local community-based water arrangements ,
which are embedded in a community's holistic governance of human and
natural resources. Community-based arrangements are often localized
but can also extend across large areas and state boundaries, for example
in pastoral communities. Community-based water arrangements seek to
support members' rights to water for life, health, subsistence and livelihoods,
and often provide the only safety nets to marginalized community members
and those affected by HIV/AIDS. These arrangements, which are usually
oral, have proven to be flexible, robust, and adaptive to population
growth and other changes overtime. Community members usually perceive
these arrangements as legitimate and representing strong cultural values.
Although power abuse by the traditional leadership structures, which
was fuelled under colonialism, can still be found, independent states
have adopted constitutional imperatives of non-discrimination and de-ethnicized
democratically elected local governance structures which progressively
enhance gender and age equity and accountability of local leadership
to their constituencies.
The existence and effectiveness of local community-based arrangements
for livelihood-oriented natural resource management and the need for
synergy with statutory legal frameworks have already been recognized
in Africa for, e.g., land tenure reform and titling. However, recent
statutory water reform in most African countries still ignores community-based
water arrangements, exclusively focusing on centralized statutory water
permits, water levies, and new basin institutions. Thus, statutory water
reform risks missing and possibly jeopardizing vital opportunities to
concretize universal human rights to water for life, human rights to
livelihood and prevention of starvation, and opportunities to achieve
the Millennium Development Goals of halving, by 2015, the number of
people without access to safe drinking water and sanitation, halving
the number of people with incomes below one dollar a day, and empowering
women.
Recommendations for policy and implementation
Therefore, the workshop participants recommend that governments, international
financing institutions, and donors:
-
In water policy and law formally recognize the
validity and legitimacy of local community-based water arrangements
- as far as they progressively comply with constitutional imperatives
and principles of human rights - as equal to, or alongside, statutory
rights and foster synergy between the systems.
-
In developing water resources provide financial
and technical support for affordable infrastructure development for
small-scale rural water uses by women and men, building on community-based
water arrangements and local government, better integrating domestic
and productive uses, and incorporating institutional principles consistent
with community-based arrangements in the technical design of infrastructure
from local to basin level.
-
In administering and authorizing water use
a) recognize small-scale rural water uses for livelihoods as lawful
without unrealistic and burdensome administrative obligations, for
example by raising the thresholds of small-scale water uses below
which water use is authorized without registration - while establishing
simple water resource planning tools to keep track of the proportion
of water resources used by small-scale users;
b) avoid imposing alien and unrealistic organizational and registration
requirements that hamper the functioning of effective and inclusive
community-based arrangements;
c) allocate collective rights to use water and to set the rules for
managing water, where appropriate;
d) charge water levies for government water resources management only
to large water users or collectives who derive most benefits from
water;
e) consider the linkages between land and water rights/allocations,
and ensure that those with unregistered communal land rights are not
excluded from obtaining water rights;
f) test the logistic requirements, implementability and enforceability
of draft legislation before adoption.
-
In mitigating upstream-downstream or groundwater
competition, e.g. in the dry season
a) prioritize and protect water uses that are most beneficial for
the livelihoods of the poor against more powerful users, for example
by facilitating dialogue according to local community-based arrangements,
such as proportional allocation;
b) provide full compensation if water has to be taken away from communities;
c) provide adequate deliberative procedures to reduce and solve conflicts
arising out of competition.
-
In establishing statutory water resources management
institutions
a) devolve (and not just deconcentrate) water management authority
to the lowest appropriate level, in particular inclusive local community-based
arrangements;
b) ensure that new water bureaucracies build on informal community-based
water arrangements and local government and that they remain small,
cost-effective and focused on pro-poor socio-economic development.
Recommendations for research and capacity building
The workshop participants acknowledged that African local community-based
water arrangements and the interface with other legal frameworks are
still inadequately understood and recommend to the following:
-
Record local community-based arrangements with
due attention to the vernacular and in such a way that communities
are empowered (e.g., ability to catalyze collective investments in
infrastructure, operation and maintenance, conflict resolution processes,
inequities and poverty, and environmental impacts);
-
Seek an understanding of the gendered dynamics
of local water and land arrangements, so as to ensure that women's
engagement with land and water for family livelihoods is respected,
protected, and improved;
-
Assess the potential advantages (e.g., empowerment
of communities against more powerful water users) and disadvantages
(e.g., freezing of the flexibility and variation over space and time)
of codification;
-
Assess the impact of statutory water reform and
identify locally appropriate and enforceable procedures, tools, and
modalities for building upon local community-based water management
arrangements in water development and regulation;
-
Learn from the experiences elsewhere, especially
in African land tenure, about synergetic co-existence of plural legal
frameworks and further explore the interface between land tenure and
water rights.
-
Train both scholars and practitioners in studying
local community-based water arrangements.
Annex: List of participants
Please note that institutional affiliations are added for identification
purposes only. Participants are not necessarily representing the agreed
views of their host institutions.
Akintomide, Cecilia African Development Bank Tunesia
Anderson, Aileen University of British Columbia Canada
Binswanger, Hans World Bank
Bruns, Bryan Freelance consultant USA
Bustamante, Rocio Centro Andino para el Gestion y Uso del Agua Bolivia
Butterworth, John Natural Resources Institute UK
Chemeda, E. Desalegn Asian Institute of Technology Thailand
Chikozho, Claudious International Water Management Institute
Chileshe, Paxina University of Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Chiuri, Wanjiku Egerton University Kenya
Cousins, Tessa Association for Water and Rural Development South Africa
Dembele, Youssouf Institute for Environmental and Agricultural Research
Burkina Faso
Derman, Bill Michigan State University USA and Noragric Norway
Djirmey, Aboubacar Beria Consulting Engineer Niger
Du Toit, Derick Association for Water and Rural Development South Africa
Earle, Anton African Water Issues Research Unit South Africa
Garduno, Hector Representative International Association for Water Law
(AIDA)
Giordano, Mark International Water Management Institute
Goldin, Jacqui Free lance consultant South Africa
Harigobin, Shantal Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Hellum, Anne Faculty of Law, University of Oslo, Norway
Juma, Ibrahim University of Dar Es Salaam, Faculty of Law, Tanzania
Kabudi, John Faculty of Law, University of Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Kambewa, Daimon Bunda College of Agriculture, University of Malawi
Lankford, Bruce School of Development Studies, University of East Anglia,
UK
Latham, Jim Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe
Lautze, Jonathan Fletcher School, Tufts University, USA
MacKay, Heather Water Research Commission, South Africa
Maganga, Faustin Inst. of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es
Salaam, Tanzania
Makombe, Godswill International Water Management Institute
Malzbender, Daniel African Water Issues Research Unit South Africa
Manzungu, Emmanuel University of Zimbabwe
Mehari Haile, Abraham UNESCO-IHE Institute for Water Education Netherlands
Meinzen-Dick, Ruth International Food Policy Research Institute
Mohamed-Katerere, J. Freelance consultant Indonesia
Mohapi, Ndileka Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Morardet, Sylvie International Water Management Institute
Morris, Mike Natural Resources Institute UK
Moseki, Chris Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Mulwafu, W. O. Chancellor College, University of Malawi
Mumma, Albert Faculty of Law, University of Nairobi, Kenya
Mwaruvanda, Willie Rufiji Basin Water Office, Tanzania
Onyango, Leah Maseno University, Kenya
Opoku-Ankomah,Yaw Water Research Institute, Ghana
Opoku-Agyemang Maxwell Ghana School of Law, Ghana
Pegram, Guy Pegasys Pty Ltd South Africa
Pollard, Sharon Association for Water and Rural Development South Africa
Ruiters, Cornelius Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Sally, Hilmy International Water Management Institute
Schreiner, Barbara Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Seetal, Ash Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Shah, Tushaar International Water Management Institute
Sikoyo, George Africa Centre for Technology Studies (ACTS) Kenya
Sithole, Pinnie Centre for Applied Social Sciences, University of Zimbabwe
Sokile, Charles University of Dar Es Salaam Tanzania
Sullivan, Amy International Water Management Institute
Swallow, Brent World Agroforestry Centre Kenya
Troell, Jessica Environmental Law Institute USA
Van Koppen, Barbara International Water Management Institute
Vermeulen, Abraham Department of Water Affairs and Forestry South Africa
Wilson, Leanne University of Newcastle UK
|
|