|
Natural Resources Institute -
South Africa REED Workshop:
Bloemfontein 25th January 2005
Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources,
University of the Free State, Bloemfontein
Background
The Rural Economic and Enterprise
Development (REED) workshop aimed to develop further the conceptual
framework and project tool for the fostering of rural economic and
enterprise development in South Africa. This programme coordinated
by the Natural Resources Institute (UK) and funded through the UK
Department for International Development is part of a multi country
initiative to develop and test the REED
framework which itself builds on established international practice.
The workshop aimed to enhance understanding of recent trends in
REED and Local Economic Development (LED), related concepts and
their implications, and the development of practical strategies
to operationalise the REED framework. Due to the complex nature
of the subject and the fact that there are no blueprints for addressing
rural economic and enterprise development, participants were encouraged
to share their practical experience of working in the field of Local
Economic Development and REED.
The full REED document is available on http://www.donorplatform.org/component/option,com_docman/task,doc_view/gid,50/Itemid,98/
The workshop was designed for local economic development (LED)
and enterprise development project managers, coordinators, advisors,
academics, and staff at design and implementation level of programmes
related to rural economic and local development, agriculture, enterprise
and rural development (government, private sector, NGOs etc.).
Numerous institutions were invited to attend the workshop, please
see list of participants in Annex. The NRI research team was represented
by Dr. Junior Davis (Enterprise, Finance and Trade Group, J.Davis@gre.ac.uk)
and Felicity Proctor (Director Programme Development).
Dr Doreen Atkinson (Karoo Institute) facilitated and organised
the workshop in cooperation with Professor Lucius Botes, Centre
for Development Support, the University of Free State. The workshop
was hosted at the University of Free State campus. Table
1 outlines the workshop programme.
Resource paper shared with the workshop participants.
This was:
Working paper 3 - Addressing poverty through local economic and
enterprise developments: A review of conceptual approaches and practice.
Junior Davis and Catherine Rylance. February 2005 (Click
here [PDF 399Kb])
Table
1: Workshop Programme
| Timing |
The Workshop Programme |
| 9:00 - 9:15 |
Arrival of participants: coffee, fruit juice and water available. |
| 9:15 - 9:30 |
Felicity Proctor and Doreen Atkinson: Welcome to the workshop,
outline of the workshop programme and objectives (15 minutes). |
| 9:30 - 10:30 |
Dr. Junior Davis outlines the REED framework. This will include
an introductory presentation on REED, international local economic
development approaches, and potential applicability of framework
to South African context. (including 15 minutes for questions
& discussion). (Click
here for ppt (125Kb) |
| 10:30 - 11:00 |
Coffee/Tea break |
| 11:00 - 13:00 |
Doreen Atkinson to facilitate (assisted by Junior Davis and
Felicity Proctor) group discussion of the REED research approach,
related issues and highlight areas for collaboration and/or
potential uptake for the research. |
| 13:00 - 14:00 |
Lunch |
| 14:00 - 15:00 |
Identification and elaboration of promising strategies and
tools to address key issues and challenges of the case studies.
Identification of follow-up actions and next steps. |
Workshop discussion
Felicity Proctor welcomed the workshop participants and outlined
the objectives of the meeting. The REED framework and methodology
was presented by Dr Junior Davis. Dr Davis outlined the REED approach,
the proposed NRI use of the framework, its relevance to recent international
local economic development initiatives and its potential applicability
to South Africa.
This was then followed by an open discussion chaired by Doreen
Atkinson (South Africa, Karoo Institute) with the workshop recipients
to:
- Evaluate the utility of REED in the South African context and
identify potential partners in taking forward REED research;
- Identify clear key researchable themes in the context of REED
and South Africa; and
- Propose follow-up actions and lessons learned for future activities
e.g., conference/workshop/publications etc.
There was a positive response from many participants. Comments
included:
- The methodology can be used as an evaluation tool by government
departments to evaluate project proposals.
- Defining “rural” requires several indicators, including
spatial location, density and function. The term acquires different
meanings in different localities. In the South African context,
this is more defined in terms of administrative boundaries and
responsibilities for different levels of government.
- REED can be usefully linked to municipal Integrated Development
Plans (IDPs) – as a tool for planning, a check list for
assessment, and for monitoring and evaluation.
- REED framework might be used in South Africa to turn around
failed projects.
- REED framework can be used to draft job descriptions of municipal
LED staff.
- REED framework can be used to promote the establishment and
functioning of multi-purpose community centres.
- One of the key challenges in South Africa, is that sectoral
government departments function in fragmented, compartmentalized
ways and the link between line departments and decentralized functions
is still evolving. The REED framework can be used to promote synergies
between departments and between central and local administrations.
- REED framework can be used to promote an effective “client
interface” in South Africa, i.e. better and more accessible
service delivery for poor people.
- Some participants also felt that REED framework support document
should also include an analysis of project failures, as we can
often learn as much from project/programme failures as successes.
Several proposals were made on the future use of the REED framework
in the Free State by the participants. These include:
- Department of Local Government and Housing proposes to use
the REED framework to evaluate municipalities’ Integrated
Development Plans in the Free State – as a check list and
also as a possible tool for training LED municipal staff.
- University’s Department of Town and Regional Planning
proposes to use REED as one of a set of tools for MA projects
and theses – projects: spatial planning for tourism and
economics for planners.
- The REED framework has already been reviewed and elements adopted
within the World Bank – Netherlands Evaluating and disseminating
experiences in LED in South Africa M&E working paper and will
be considered for use in a related rural- urban linkages study
in Mangaung Local Municipality in cooperation with Khanya- MRC
- The Centre for Development Support University of Free State
will also explore follow up opportunities
The NRI team will work with the above and other tentative proposals
to support the processes and actions. Follow up meetings with individual
teams were arranged and held to work through next steps.
Annex. Workshop participants
| Name |
Organisation |
Position |
| Doreen Atkinson |
Karoo Institute |
Director |
| Wesley Shongwe |
Land Bank |
Sales and Account Mgr |
| Mpho Maloka |
University of London |
SA Dept of IA & Student |
| Ian Goldman |
Khanya-MRC |
Director |
| Lindi Mdhluli |
Khanya-MRC |
Researcher |
| Lucius Botes |
Centre for Development Support |
Director |
| Retha du Plessis |
Free State Rural Development Partnership |
Co-ordinator |
| Sehloho Pholoana |
Department of Labour |
Asst Manager |
| Pulani Simes |
Karoo Institute |
Admin Asst |
| JL de Beer |
Kopanong Municipality |
Councillor |
| Lize de Ridder |
Dept Urban and Regional Planning |
UFS Lecturer |
| Christine Prinsloo |
Dept of Local Govt and Housing, Free State |
LED Manager |
| Lockner Marais |
Centre for Development Support |
Researcher |
| Jannie Hanse |
Xhariep District Municipality |
Financial Manager |
| Mamarinyana Thulare |
Development Bank of Southern Africa |
Programme Manager |
| A. Obi |
Dept Agriculture, UFS |
Senior Researcher |
| Joyce Ndhukula |
Dept Agriculture, FS Government |
Agricultural Scientist |
| Lulu de Jager |
Free State Agriculture |
Organisation and development |
The Natural Resources Institute, Department for International
Development funded research project aims to develop further a conceptual
framework and project tool for the fostering of rural economic and
enterprise development in South Africa and Bangladesh.

General discussion
A number of the programmes recognized the need
for some broadening out of the framework within which they operate
e.g. KATALYST, BRDB although there was concern expressed by some
participants on taking on too wide a mandate. Whilst the Chars programme
of DFID has a wider operational framework, it has yet to become
fully operational.
Some participants felt that the different cornerstones
of the REED framework operate at different levels and suggested
that it would be helpful to differentiate these. Others questioned
how poverty was specifically addressed through the framework.
It was recognized that many current initiatives
in Bangladesh may not be giving adequate attention to sustainability
and that a number of programmes were weakly integrated within and
or associated to public sector activities.
The extent of poverty and rural focus in some of
SME and BDS work was questioned and there exists scope to seek to
understand who benefits and losses from particular types of intervention.
In general, there are opportunities to: strengthen the linkages
between the formal and informal sectors; deepen the understanding
of the labour market including associated remittance management;
strengthen the empirical basis which informs investment choice;
build a common understanding between practitioners on how to intervene
within the market (noting in particular the level of effective subsidy
offered through some donor initiatives); and deepen an understanding
of the linkages between urban and rural economic activity.
The need to strengthen the mechanisms for lesson
sharing was emphasised. A new initiative (web-based learning platform)
supported by DFID through CARE was noted and aims to strengthen
good practice sharing for BDS – this was welcomed. Additional
opportunities exist for lesson sharing and validation of replicable
practice within all the key elements of the REED framework.
The group felt that the REED framework offers a
framework for joint learning, a tool for analysis and dialogue,
a check list for project development and a tool to inform monitoring
and evaluation. A number of participants expressed interest in holding
follow up discussion with the REED team.
Timetable for follow up action
- Post all papers on the website – beginning December 2004
- Agree collaborator partner by end December 2004
- Undertake preliminary secondary data and institutional assessment
for pilot location – January 2005
- REED workshop at pilot location (1-2 days) and research planning
– February 2005
- Host follow up workshop in REED principles with specific groups
e.g. BRDB – February 2005
- Undertake field action research – March – July 2005
- Undertake complimentary empirical research (subject to ESRC
or DFID supplementary funds) March – October 2005
- Host review meeting – November 2005
|