The learning alliance approach is one such way. Key post-harvest
stakeholders from all sectors - public, private and voluntary -
were invited to form an alliance with the strategic aim of "better
mobilisation of national innovation systems to sustain the uptake
and adoption of post-harvest knowledge for the benefits of poor
farmers", but set the specific challenge of exploring better
ways of working and learning together to overcome institutional
constraints.
The main activities of the learning alliance - the Post-Harvest
Innovation Learning Alliance, or PHILA for short - have been collaborative
research, information-sharing (internal), and engaging with and
influencing other (i.e. external) key players in the post-harvest
system. The alliance moreover, provides an on-going means to ensure
delivery and consolidation of the project purpose over time; something
otherwise unlikely to have happened within the short time-frame
(<12 months) of the project.
Characteristics of Learning Alliances
Learning Alliances: Are groups of individuals
or organisations with a mutual interest in solving an underlying
problem and scaling-up solutions.
Bring together a wide range of partners with capabilities in
implementation, regulation, policy & legislation, research
& learning, documentation & dissemination etc.
Represent part of the bigger whole, and thus capture some of
the organisational complexity that constitutes the day-to-day
realities of the innovation system.
Comprise partners who are typically clustered at different ‘administrative’
(e.g. national, regional, district) levels – stakeholder
platforms – within the innovation system.
Aim to identify and breakdown the barriers that constrain learning
– both across platforms (i.e. horizontally) and between
platforms (i.e. vertically).
Promote flexible and adaptive working practices, share responsibilities,
costs and benefits.
Based on: Moriarty et al. (2005)