WTO and Ethical Trade

October 1999
Edition 1

Navigating the Site

Ethical Trade Watching Brief Home

Introducing the Issues
- Introduction
- WTO and forest certification
- Forest certification and eco-labels
- WTO and Seattle
- Ethical Trade and Protection
Factors Pushing Ethical Trade
- Positive policy factors
- Moves towards Sustainable Forest Management
- National Level Initiatives
- Social trends and Ethical consumers
Unpacking the Trade Policy Issues
- Eco-labels, trade law and protectionism
- The links between social and labour issues and trade
- Liberalisation in the Forest sector
Implications
- Implications of environmental rule changes
- Implications of the social and labour standards debate
- Implications of liberalisation in the forest sector
- Conclusions

- References
- Useful Links






Eco-labelling

What is an eco-label?

    'a policy instrument selected by an issuing entity that attempts to communicate and promote distinctions in similar products based on the relative impact of the products on the environment' (Caldwell, 1996).

Eco-labels are usually awarded following an assessment of the environmental effects of a product using life cycle analysis. LCA takes many forms, but the basic idea is to conduct an assessment of environmental impacts associated with the production and consumption (Caldwell 1996).

For a comprehensive analysis and set of case studies of eco-labelling and trade, see Zarrilli et al, 1997.

Eco-labels and forest certification

On this web site forest certification has been discussed under the more general banner of eco-labelling. This is because many of the trade issues as discussed at the WTO are similar. However there are some important differences:

  • Forest certification does not always result in the award of a label. It is the site that is assessed, not the product. Chain of custody assessment is required as well if the forest products are to bear a label.
  • Forest certification is a single-issue assessment concerned with the management of the forest resource. Eco-labelling tends to assess many issues from production, to processing to product use.
(Bourke and Leitch, 1998).

However, the similarities between eco-labelling and forest certification in terms of potential trade effects and their status in trade law means that the literature on eco-labels covers many of the trade arguments related to forest certification.

Back to introduction
Back to NRET homepage